ATLANTA-A federal appeals court has ruled that cardholders for BB&T must arbitrate their disputes on the bank's overdraft procedures instead of litigating, under a mandatory arbitration clause in their customer agreement.

The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reverses a district court judge's decision in September that rejected compelling the use of arbitration.

The appeals court agreed with the lower court judge that a portion of the bank's customer agreement was "unconscionable," but said that portion that requires the customer to pay for any dispute, even if the consumer wins, could be eliminated while the rest of the agreement is enforced.

The ruling bars the customers of the North Carolina bank from suing as a group.

The ruling comes as at least nine credit unions are defending themselves against new class action suit making similar claims as in the BB&T case, which is that they unfairly reordered payments on debit transactions based on the amount of the transaction and not the chronological date.

BB&T said in a statement it is pleased the appeals court "has agreed with our position and recognized that arbitration is a proper and reasonable means to resolve a dispute of this nature."

Subscribe Now

Authoritative analysis and perspective for every segment of the credit union industry

14-Day Free Trial

No credit card required. Complete access to articles, breaking news and industry data.