A Risk-Management Strategy Deserving of Consideration

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious is a word that we were introduced to in the 1964 Disney musical film "Mary Poppins." What does it mean? Who really knows, but it is a pleasant sounding word and has a good ring to it.

Recently, I was introduced to a financial concept that I call interestrateriskderivativeswapcap. The word may not flow as easily as the one made famous by Julie Andrews, but it does have an interesting sound to it and combines, for the most part, much of what needs to be looked at when proposed as a risk management option for credit unions.

Financial regulators are consistently looking at additional, permissible ways for the institutions they regulate to invest their funds. In today's economy, having experienced losses as a result of a recession that refuses to leave, an economy that cannot heal itself and a housing market that has more problems than a math book, financial institutions are trying to find ways to protect themselves from the interest rate risk that comes with the current environment while at the same time achieving acceptable returns.

Interestrateriskderivativesswapcap is not an easy concept to understand. When evaluating this concept, we need to look at the words that make it up and try to understand the meaning of each. Interest rate risk is the risk inherent in an interest bearing asset. A financial derivative is an asset whose value depends on the behavior of another asset or assets. An interest rate swap is a contractual agreement between two parties to exchange interest payments at certain intervals over a specific time period. A cap is a contractual agreement in which buyers pay upfront premiums to receive payments at the end of each period in which interest rates exceed an agreed upon rate.

When combined we have interestrateriskderivativesswapcap. Still a little confused? Don't feel bad if you are. It is not an easy concept to grasp, understand and implement. However, it is and can be a valuable tool for some credit unions.

NCUA approved derivative pilot programs for individual credit unions and third-party vendors beginning in 1999. Currently, 10 credit unions are involved in the derivative activity either independently or in a vendor-operated program. The participating credit unions, all large, have approximately 1.2 billion dollars in the program.


More Than Enough Time

Thirteen years is more than enough time to generate and evaluate a pilot program. NCUA must now decide if the lessons learned from this program now merit it be refined, improved, and offered to those credit unions strong enough and having the necessary expertise to participate in the activity

Derivative transactions like member business loans or alternative capital, are not for every CU. However, there are some for which it can be a valuable addition to their tool box.

With proper regulation, control, due diligence, monitoring, and common sense, derivative transactions can be of significant value to the credit union industry.

Michael E. Fryzel, Board Member

NCUA, Alexandria, Va.